Filed: Jun. 03, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 442 F.2d 1350 Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant, v. JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee. No. 25306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 3, 1971. Richard S. Berger (argued), Bernard Shapiro, of Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 On review here are two items of accountants' fees in the amounts of $2,413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings. 2 We f
Summary: 442 F.2d 1350 Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant, v. JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee. No. 25306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 3, 1971. Richard S. Berger (argued), Bernard Shapiro, of Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 On review here are two items of accountants' fees in the amounts of $2,413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings. 2 We fi..
More
442 F.2d 1350
Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee.
No. 25306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 3, 1971.
Richard S. Berger (argued), Bernard Shapiro, of Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
On review here are two items of accountants' fees in the amounts of $2,413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings.
2
We find the allowance of the $2,413.35 was clearly erroneous, which appellee virtually concedes.
3
We cannot find the award of $4,117.85 was clearly erroneous.
4
Remanded for a modification consistent herewith.
